ACUPCC Reporting System

GHG Report for New York University

Submitted on March 26, 2010; last updated on February 1, 2012

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 178,283 metric tons of CO2e 5.4 metric tons of CO2e 13.4 metric tons of CO2e 0%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 204,340 metric tons of CO2e 6.1 metric tons of CO2e 15.3 metric tons of CO2e 0%
Net emissions 204,340 metric tons of CO2e 6.1 metric tons of CO2e 15.3 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report September 1, 2005
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries Equity share approach
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

Near-complete campus energy use data is available for all owned and leased buildings, representing 13,341,307 square feet of building space.

There are several exceptions:

1) The NYU Langone Medical School is a largely autonomous entity which does not fall within the organizational boundary established by this inventory; neither their emissions nor their buildings' square footage are included.

2) The newly-affiliated Polytechnic Institute of NYU remains relatively autonomous in terms of its operational structure, and neither their emissions nor their buildings' square footage are included in this inventory. Like the School of Medicine, NYU-Poly has independently signed on to the NYC Mayoral Challenge, and has begun its own climate action planning process.

3) This inventory extends only to NYU's buildings and infrastructure within New York City, and not to any NYU-affiliated sites or campuses in other countries.

Our standard has been to assume "ownership" of emissions for all buildings which we occupy and for which we pay utility bills. This figure represents nearly all of NYU's holdings, owned or leased, in NYC.

Emissions calculation tool used Custom tool
Please describe why this tool was selected.

As a signatory of New York City's PlaNYC 2030 Climate Challenge, we are required to submit an emissions inventory to the Mayor's office using a set of emissions coefficients and standards comparable to those used for New York City's own greenhouse gas inventory. This is a terrific way for NYU to understand its relationship with NYC -- to the tune of nearly .3% of all NYC emissions under the aegis of the university.

For certain coefficients and calculations, however, NYU has encountered additional needs which extend beyond inventorying, toward modeling future emissions and reduction strategies under the Climate Action Plan.

To this end, a collaboration between Operations, the Sustainability Task Force, and the student Climate Action Plan team developed a comprehensive spreadsheet tool which replaced ICLEI as NYU's primary inventory calculator and emissions reduction modeler, listing all University buildings and their commodity use of grid electricity, natural gas, heating oils, and steam. The spreadsheet was designed to calculate emissions for individual buildings or fuel sources and to aggregate and report this information.

This new tool enabled NYU to dynamically explore diverse emissions reduction projects and strategies targeting specific commodities or buildings that would lead to the largest environmental benefits.

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

ICLEI's CACP Software includes emissions coefficients embedded in the software package (based on the IPCC Second Assessment Report, as listed below).

In coordination with New York City's own inventory and our participation in the Mayoral Challenge, we applied modified versions of ICLEI emissions coefficients for electricity, steam and heavy fuel oil which correspond to the localized custom coefficients used by the City. These were retroactively edited in NYC's 2009 and again in their 2011 GHG inventory report, and similarly edited retroactively here.

Unmodified ICLEI coefficients for waste stream landfill emissions were used in our inventory.

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? Second Assessment Report
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? Sustainability office staff
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

With advice from the NYU Sustainability Task Force Environmental Assessment working group, NYU Office of Sustainability staff distributed a data request to operational departments throughout the university.

Utility, transportation, waste and other data were assembled as part of NYU's comprehensive annual Environmental Assessment effort, of which this inventory is one component. For more information on our Environmental Assessment, please visit: http://www.nyu.edu/sustainability/environmental.assessment/

During the 2008-2009 academic year, the Energy and Water Working Group of NYU's Sustainability Task Force brainstormed an effective Climate Action Plan methodology, produced basic structural outlines, and designed an initial data spreadsheet that calculated NYU's estimated greenhouse gas inventory for energy.

The custom spreadsheet tool houses (1) NYU's comprehensive building list, with details such as associated commodity consumption per building, square footage, and building type and (2) the emissions coefficients provided by the New York City Mayor's Office. These serve as tracking tools from which all other calculations in the spreadsheet draw (for instance, the greenhouse gas inventory is also tracked on the spreadsheet, generated from commodity consumption data and emissions coefficients).

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

No information provided

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

1) The inventory emissions totals for our university-owned vehicle fleet (53 vehicles)for 2006 are based on the projection of gasoline purchases from a single month onto the entire year. We are making the assumption that the purchases in this one month (November 2007) are representative of gasoline consumption for the given year. (Note that the larger volume of emissions from the contracted third-party student shuttle fleets are based on total annual gasoline consumption, not a single month of gasoline bills.) After 2006, we began to obtain these figures for an entire fiscal year, and found the actual results on par with this sampling method.

2) University-related air travel emissions are listed as a required field in this report. However, NYU does not currently centrally track student, faculty or staff air travel. These purchasing decisions are made either on a department-specific or a private basis (and reimbursed); purchasing records do not include number of flights, flight distances, or destinations. We will seek to develop methods of evaluating this gap in our data in future inventories. It is likely that future inclusion of university-related air travel will substantively enlarge NYU's total emissions inventory.

3) NYU did not centrally track student, faculty or staff commuting as of 2006. In 2009, we gained access to data on approximate distances from campus that students, faculty and staff lived, and then used results from a professionally-administered survey estimating student, faculty and staff commuting habits, and gained a transportation modal split. Using these data we compiled a customized GHG inventory tool for commuting emissions, and have applied that 2009 result to prior (2006-08) and subsequent years.

In future inventories, we plan to utilize an in-development customized food/procurement greenhouse gas emissions estimation calculator which will enable us to quantify and include this element of our climate impact.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 119,327.0 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 1,189.0 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 120,516.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 51,905.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 5,862.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 57,767.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 25,809.0 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste 248.0 metric tons of CO2e
Dining Hall Food No information provided
Refrigerants No information provided
Total Scope 3 emissions 26,057.0 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased No information provided
Offset verification program(s) No information provided
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased None kWh
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs None %
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
REC verification program(s) No information provided
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution No information provided
Description of how sequestration was calculated

No information provided

Carbon storage due to composting No information provided

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 13,341,307.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space No information provided
Net assignable square feet of health care space No information provided
Net assignable square feet of residential space No information provided
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 33315.0
Residential Students 12609
Full-time Commuter Students 17013
Part-time Commuter Students 9619
Non-Credit Students No information provided
Full-time Faculty 2043
Part-time Faculty 2584
Full-time Staff 5228
Part-time Staff 352
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size 2500000000
Heating Degree Days No information provided
Cooling Degree Days No information provided
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

Endowment figure based on FY 2007 statistics.

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative No information provided
Completed inventory calculator No information provided

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.
Please briefly describe this verification, if any.

Sustainability Manager Jeremy Friedman reviewed, using data provided by Director of Energy and Sustainability Cecil Scheib and other university administrative and departmental staff. Please see New York University's Climate Action Plan Report for more on the process of GHG Inventory development, assembly, auditing and verification. www.nyu.edu/sustainability/climateaction