ACUPCC Reporting System

GHG Report for Berea College

Submitted on September 15, 2010; last updated on May 8, 2012

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 18,383 metric tons of CO2e 12.2 metric tons of CO2e 13.1 metric tons of CO2e 148%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 22,551 metric tons of CO2e 15.0 metric tons of CO2e 16.0 metric tons of CO2e 121%
Net emissions -4,678 metric tons of CO2e -3.1 metric tons of CO2e -3.3 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report July 1, 2009
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries Operational control approach
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

College-owned rental homes beyond the Campus proper are not included as they are private residences and do not represent the operational responsibility of Berea College.

Emissions calculation tool used Clean Air-Cool Planet
Please describe why this tool was selected.

CA-CP is the recommended tool for the ACUPCC implementation and was utilized in previous GHG calculations.

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

CA-CP Campus Carbon Calculator's default emissions coefficients for eGRID subregions (Kentucky falls under SRTV subregion and SERC Tennessee Valley region post-2006) were used in the analyses.

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? Third Assessment Report
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? Campus Energy Manager
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

In 2007, Dr. Larry Shinn signed the ACUPCC commitment and designated individuals to serve as the leadership team for coordinating the necessary data collection and implementing the GHG inventory. The announcement alerted the campus community that the process would require the participation of various departments and programs and that the leadership team would immediately be contacting people to discuss the specific information to be gathered and their respective roles in providing accurate and timely responses to requests.

The data collection process for calculating the 2008-09 and 2009-10 GHG inventories followed the same process used in 2007-08. The organizational boundary was limited primarily to the campus proper as well as protected forest holdings bordering the town and county. About one half of the required information was directly available from the Facilities Management Department on campus. This included physical benchmark data, utilities, refrigerants, fleet vehicle fuel usage and solid waste. Other communication and collaboration with all additional campus departments/programs to collect other types of information was coodinated through the Business Office. This included items such as population data, agricultural data, employee data, travel reports, study abroad, paper usage and mitigation data such as forest sequestration and composting. Though a series of email requests and one-on-one meetings as necessary, the team helped identify the correct sources of information and clarify the type and scoper of the request. Student employees assisted with the data collection whenever possible. After the data was collected and compiled, it was entered into the CA-CP calculator for inclusion in this report.

Campus collaborators participated willingly and as expeditiously as possible in the process of data collection and interpretation. WHile some information was relatively simple to gather, other types of documentation can be improved and refined to provide more accurate and organized information for future inventories. In some cases, improved data collection methods were established using lessons learned from previous GHG calculations. A follow-up meeting with the President and other key administrators will take place to address the challenges of the process and to review the findings and a summary report on the inventory will be provided to the campus community.

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

N/A

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

Several small campus programs own and operate vehicles independently of the Motor Pool and Facilities Management fleets. The usage data for these vehicles (<10) is not included in this report but will be identified for inclusion in the future.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 3,812.0 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 313.0 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 519.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 4,644.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 13,739.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 13,739.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 936.0 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 1,202.0 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste 456.0 metric tons of CO2e
Other Directly Financed Travel 119.3 metric tons of CO2e
Paper Purchasing 68.5 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 T&D Losses 1,385.9 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 3 emissions 4,167.7 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion No information provided
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion No information provided

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Offset verification program(s) No information provided
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

N/A

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased 0 kWh
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs 0.0 %
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
REC verification program(s) No information provided
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

N/A

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution 27,192.0 metric tons of CO2e
Description of how sequestration was calculated

The Berea College Forester worked in collaboration with the MACED Forest Opportunities Initiative to calculate the College's MTeCO2 offset for its 8,000+ acre forst holdings. The multiplier used was 3.3 tons/acre/year as listed in the Chicago Climate Exchange for Kentucky. Thus, the total offset of -27,192 MTecCO2 was calculated from the sum of the following:

Newly Forested: 70 acres x 3.3 = 231 tons/acre/year

Existing: 8,170 acres x 3.3 = 26,961 tons/acre/year

Carbon storage due to composting 37.0 metric tons of CO2e

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 1,405,967.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space 25,000.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of health care space 1,836.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of residential space 400,357.0 sq ft
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 1501.0
Residential Students 1454
Full-time Commuter Students No information provided
Part-time Commuter Students No information provided
Non-Credit Students No information provided
Full-time Faculty 161
Part-time Faculty No information provided
Full-time Staff 344
Part-time Staff No information provided
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size 846776300
Heating Degree Days 4762
Cooling Degree Days 1269
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

No information provided

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative No information provided
Completed inventory calculator No information provided

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.
Please briefly describe this verification, if any.

While the entire GHG inventory (process and compiled results) was not formally audited, specific pieces were reviewed by multiple individuals or departments. For example, some components of the inventory were provided, confirmed and/or reviewed by third-party suppliers (ie: utilities, solid waste totals, refrigerants, fleet fuel). Other components were reviewed in-house by campus colleagues with relevant expertise (ie: paper purchases, compost, benchmark data).