ACUPCC Reporting System

GHG Report for Syracuse University

Submitted on September 12, 2008; last updated on November 26, 2008

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 88,027 metric tons of CO2e 5.1 metric tons of CO2e 12.1 metric tons of CO2e 0%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 126,925 metric tons of CO2e 7.4 metric tons of CO2e 17.4 metric tons of CO2e 0%
Net emissions 126,925 metric tons of CO2e 7.4 metric tons of CO2e 17.4 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report July 1, 2003
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries Operational control approach
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

SU-owned and/or operated facilities away from our main campuses in Central New York were excluded, as these operations clearly fall within the de minimus range, and data collection would have consumed much time and expense.

Emissions calculation tool used Clean Air-Cool Planet
Please describe why this tool was selected.

CA/CP is consistent with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, and was recommended in the PCC Implementation Guidelines.

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

Electrical generation mix was set to Upstate New York regional values. Otherwise, all default coefficients from CA/CP were used as supplied (version 5.0).

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? Third Assessment Report
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? Sustainability office staff
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

Sustainability Division staff collected data from various University administrative systems, including energy management, space management, student records (registrations), human resources (employment), and study abroad (registrations, implying travel). A stratified survey was conducted of commuters (faculty, staff, students) during the Spring 2007 semester; commuting averages calculated were extrapolated to previous timeframes based on headcounts.

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

No information provided

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

Data for University-paid travel is known to be incomplete. No reasonable means exists for estimating the portion of travel which is not accounted for.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 6,340.0 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 2,443.0 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 8,783.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 53,423.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 5.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 25,816.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 79,244.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 19,453.0 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 19,445.0 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste No information provided
Total Scope 3 emissions 38,898.0 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion No information provided
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion No information provided

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased No information provided
Offset verification program(s) No information provided
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased None kWh
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs None %
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs No information provided
REC verification program(s) No information provided
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution No information provided
Description of how sequestration was calculated

No information provided

Carbon storage due to composting No information provided

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 7,292,857.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space 206,002.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of health care space No information provided
Net assignable square feet of residential space No information provided
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 17095.0
Residential Students 7500
Full-time Commuter Students 8051
Part-time Commuter Students 1544
Non-Credit Students No information provided
Full-time Faculty 990
Part-time Faculty No information provided
Full-time Staff 3373
Part-time Staff No information provided
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size No information provided
Heating Degree Days No information provided
Cooling Degree Days No information provided
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

Note that SU's solid waste goes to a waste-to-energy facility operated by the Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency. As a result, CA/CP calculated a net reduction of 304 tonnes eCO2 for FY 2004. We have decided not to enter this reduction credit, on the theory that it unintentionally rewards increases in the solid waste stream, to the disadvantage of recycling and other waste reduction efforts.

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative Syracuse University’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Download
Completed inventory calculator Download

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have not been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.